daisy, erin daisy

My guiding philosophy for the next year while I recenter and focus on learning how to teach. For more on the artist, who is really fascinating: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Cahun

My guiding philosophy for the next year while I recenter and focus on learning how to teach. For more on the artist, who is really fascinating: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Cahun

You got beef now watch how I settle it
I’ll fuck around and arrest your whole development
I’m eloquent
When it comes to digital display
I’m ready for the world while you earl off the Tanqueray
Tactics, my shits Jurassic 5
Fingers of death while you exhale and inhale
With a deep breath with my Chop-Sui style
Cause I’m a lyrical chef
I gets mines to the death
Cause I be cookin
From here to Brooklyn
Your shits annoying like fat-ass Bookman
On Good Times
When I rhyme
I hit the designated area
I hope you got your shots cause this is lyrical malaria
Spreading, beheading fools with the punishment
I live in America but fuck this government
A hundred and fifty times over silk with lead
While y’all drink the similack
My rhymes are breast-fed
No artificial nipples
I flip the real skills
I thought I told you once
I kick the lyrical windmills
And backspin Benedict
Strictly for my benefit
I step on toes when I flow don’t get offended
Come and get with it
Comprehended when I kick it
I represent the real
From the beginning to the end of it

Jurassic 5, “Concrete Schoolyard”

(one of my favorite flows evarrrrrr)

Dylan Rodriguez on Teaching Against the PIC

“Perhaps, then, there is no viable or defensible pedagogical position other than the abolitionist one. To live and work, learn and teach, and survive and thrive in a time defined by the capacity and political willingness to eliminate and neutralize populations [talking about the end result of the PIC] through a culturally valorized, state sanctioned nexus of institutional violence, is to better understand why abolitionist praxis in this historical moment is primarily pedagogical, within and against the ‘system’ in which it occurs. While it is conceivable that in future moments, abolitionist praxis can focus more centrally on matters of creating and not simply opposing public policy, infrastructure building, and economic reorganization, the present moment clearly demands a convening of radical pedagogical energies that can build the collective human power, epistemic and knowledge apparatuses, the material sites of learning that are the precondition of authentic and liberatory social transformations.

The prison regime is the institutionalization and systemic expansion of massive human misery. It is the production of bodily and psychic disarticulation on multiple scales, across different physiological capacities. The [PIC] is, in its logic of organization and its production of common sense, at least proto-genocidal. Finally, the prison regime is inseparable from—that is, present in— the schooling regime in which teachers are entangled. Prison is not simply a place to which one is displaced and where one’s physiological being is disarticulated, at the rule and whim of the state and its designated representatives (police, parole officers, school teachers). The prison regime is the assumptive premise of classroom teaching generally. While many of us must live in labored denial of this fact in order to teach as we must about “American democracy,” “freedom,” and “(civil) rights,” there are opportune moments in which it is useful to come clean: the vast majority of what occurs in U.S. classrooms—from preschool to graduate school—cannot accommodate the bare truth of the proto-genocidal prison regime as a violent ordering of the world, a primary component of civil society/school, and a material presence in our everyday teaching acts.

As teachers, we are institutionally hailed to the service of genocide management, in which our pedagogical labor is variously engaged in mitigating, valorizing, critiquing, redeeming, justifying, lamenting, and otherwise reproducing or tolerating the profound and systemic violence of the global-historical U.S. Nation building project. As “radical” teachers, we are politically hailed to betray genocide management in order to embrace the urgent challenge of genocide abolition. The short-term survival of those populations rendered most vulnerable to the mundane and spectacular violence of this system, and the long-term survival of most of the planet’s human population (particularly those descended from survivors of enslavement, colonization, conquest, and economic exploitation), is the significantly dependent on our willingness to embrace this form of pedagogical audacity.”

Rodriguez, Dylan. “The Disorientation of the Teaching Act: Abolition as Pedagogical Position.” Radical Teacher. 88 (2010): 7-19. Print.

“the fire of the alphabet”

I’m very much in a romance with the writing process and language generally right now. Making words work, altering who they work for. Being in the conversation. Eliot’s “The Wasteland” blew my mind last night and Virginia Woolf is reaching out from her sea grave, moving stones from her pockets into my hands, altering my perception of time, guiding my fingers.

Both make clear to me the complex fact that it is altogether possible to both hate a text or disdain an author, but also to harbor deep, stubborn admiration simultaneously. I don’t have to love them, they move me insistently regardless. They reach out across time and space, their voices still reverberate across the Atlantic, after all these years.

If desire is repressed, it is because every position of desire, no matter how small, is capable of calling into question the established order of a society: not that desire is asocial, on the contrary. But it is explosive; there is no desiring-machine capable of being assembled without demolishing entire social sectors. Despite what some revolutionaries think about this, desire is revolutionary in its essence — desire, not left-wing holidays! — and no society can tolerate a position of real desire without its structures of exploitation, servitude, and hierarchy being compromised.
Deleuze and Guattari (1983) [1972] Anti-Oedipus, Section II.7 Social Repression and Psychic repression, pp.123-32. New idea: the pedagogy of desire.

I have created a conversation in my cubicle. I felt a need to create a physical relationship between these voices speaking across time and space in my mind. They are stuck with tape to the grey, monotonous surface of my cubicle walls and situated so that I am in the center of this dialogue at all times as I enter data, put pieces of paper in order, contemplating all the while. I am not supposed to use tape on these rented surfaces, yet, there remains this need to have these combinations of words stuck to these walls I am encumbered by day after day, replicating the way in which they stick in my mind: directing my attention as well as calling out to one another, reflecting on the past and heralding the future.


 about   archive   ask   following   random   rss 
Designed by Richard Mavis. Powered by Tumblr.